ACTION ALERT DEADLINE EXTENDED - EPA: Deny a Petition that Would Provide Pesticide Companies Immunity
- Feb 18, 2025
- 2 min read
Updated: Mar 21, 2025
THERE IS STILL TIME TO COMMENT - Deadline for Public Comments EXTENDED to 11:59 pm ET Monday, March 24
While Bayer and other chemical companies are trying to pass the pesticide immunity bill, known as the Cancer Gag Act, in Iowa and other states, there is also another effort to provide pesticide companies with immunity. This is through an EPA pesticide petition filed by the attorneys general of 11 states, including Iowa’s Brenna Bird.
The EPA is accepting public comments on the pesticide petition until MONDAY, MARCH 24 - EXTENDED DEADLINE. Action is needed immediately. Find out how you can take action here.
WHAT THE PETITION WOULD DO:
The petition calls for removing a state’s right to require supplemental labels in addition to those already approved by the EPA. The petition primarily targets California Proposition 65 warnings on glyphosate, but it’s expected to have much broader ramifications.
According to Beyond Pesticides, “If states cannot convey their restrictions on the label, it is unlikely that a user of the product will be aware of the restrictions. Similarly, the courts have upheld a state’s and manufacturer’s ‘duty to warn’ of pesticide’s hazards as a right and responsibility that is not at odds with ‘misbranding’ regulations under the federal pesticide law.”
In fact, they report that “states and local governments are often at the leading edge in protecting people, land, and water from hazards.”
If the EPA approves this petition, it would provide legal immunity to chemical companies by allowing EPA-approved labels to be considered sufficient warning. Additional state-approved labels would be considered misbranding and thereby prohibited.
This petition is an end-run around state bills like the Cancer Gag Act. It benefits no one but the chemical companies looking to avoid costly litigation for harms their pesticides may cause. It’s important to understand that the use of glyphosate or other agrichemicals are not in danger of being prohibited, contrary to pesticide industry fear tactics that target farmers.
WHAT YOU CAN DO
Send a public comment telling the EPA to deny the petition of these 11 attorneys general. Beyond Pesticides created a public comment letter that you can find here. Copy the letter, or write your own comments, and file them here.
There is still time to submit comments. The deadline for all comments is extended to 11:59 pm ET on Monday, March 24. Please take a moment to send in your comment today.
Learn more about this petition here.
Let’s work together to protect public health from harmful pesticides.
I read the article and it really stood out to me how it explains the EPA petition and the concern about pesticide companies possibly getting immunity from stronger state level warnings. It made me think about how rules like this can affect public safety in ways people do not always notice. I remember during a busy semester when I was trying to keep up with environmental topics, I even used online calculus class help because I was overwhelmed with deadlines. It really shows how important it is for science and policy decisions to stay transparent and careful.
Reading the post made me think about how important safety rules are for protecting people and the environment. It reminded me of when we discussed health risks in class and how regulations can make a big difference in everyday life. I used a health care assignment writing service while working on a school health topic, and it helped me understand complex ideas more clearly. It showed me that good rules and clear research help keep communities safer.
I was thinking about the recent EPA pesticide petition and how it’s a reminder of how important it is to protect the public from corporate interests. Much like how students often need help with assignments, I’ve found that relying on an essay writing service can provide the clarity needed when overwhelmed by complex topics.